The phrase suggests a perceived overreach of govt energy and a disregard for conventional democratic norms. It alludes to behaviors harking back to monarchical rule, the place authority is concentrated and exercised with restricted checks and balances. For instance, unilateral decision-making, claims of absolute immunity, and the cultivation of non-public loyalty over institutional allegiance is perhaps cited as proof supporting this assertion.
Such perceptions are consequential as a consequence of their potential impression on the steadiness of democratic establishments. Traditionally, accusations of autocratic conduct have fueled political polarization and social unrest. The perceived erosion of established norms can result in mistrust in authorities and undermine the legitimacy of political processes. Analyzing this declare requires analyzing particular actions and statements in opposition to established constitutional ideas and historic precedents.
