This phrase seems to be a mix of a correct noun denoting a former U.S. president and a correct noun signifying a extremely influential physicist and mathematician. Such a juxtaposition is inherently incongruous, because the people signify disparate domains: politics and science.
The implied comparability may serve numerous rhetorical functions, maybe aiming to affiliate one particular person with attributes or controversies linked to the opposite. Given the historic significance of the scientist and the extensively publicized nature of the political determine, the mix creates an instantaneous and probably provocative distinction. The intent is perhaps to evoke robust emotional responses or spark particular strains of thought inside an viewers.