The expression denotes a sentiment of better confidence or reliance on different entities, ideas, or objects in comparison with a particular particular person. For instance, one may assert a better belief in established scientific consensus than in assertions made by the person in query.
This type of comparability serves to spotlight perceived deficiencies within the trustworthiness of the person being referenced. Its prevalence usually displays broader societal considerations concerning credibility, transparency, and moral conduct in management and decision-making. Historic cases of comparable comparative statements will be present in political discourse and public commentary, usually used to critique figures perceived as missing integrity.
