The phrasing describes a perceived energy dynamic between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, suggesting that one chief exerted vital management or affect over the opposite. It is a metaphor implying subservience, the place one celebration’s actions and choices are dictated by one other.
This interpretation carries substantial weight as a consequence of its implications for worldwide relations and nationwide safety. The concept that a international chief might manipulate or management the actions of a U.S. president raises issues about compromised sovereignty and potential vulnerabilities in international coverage decision-making. Historic context would contain analyzing particular cases of interplay between the 2 leaders to judge the validity and extent of any potential affect.
