The time period “segregation ban,” when referring to actions taken through the Trump administration, mostly factors to the rescinding of honest housing laws designed to fight discriminatory housing practices. These laws, carried out below the Obama administration, aimed to deal with disparate affect, the place insurance policies that seem impartial on the floor can have discriminatory results on protected teams. As an example, a landlord’s strict “no prison report” coverage might disproportionately have an effect on minority candidates who could have greater charges of arrest on account of historic and systemic biases within the prison justice system.
These honest housing guidelines have been seen as necessary instruments for guaranteeing equal entry to housing and stopping refined types of discrimination that always perpetuate segregation. Advocates argued that they supplied a mechanism to problem insurance policies and practices that, whereas not explicitly discriminatory, had the impact of denying housing alternatives based mostly on race, ethnicity, or different protected traits. Traditionally, such laws have been essential in dismantling discriminatory practices that contribute to residential segregation and restrict entry to alternatives for marginalized communities.
